The muscle hijackers ‘picked by bin Laden’:
Satam al Suqami, Wail and Waleed al Shehri (two brothers) Both Alive, Abdul Aziz al Omari Alive, Fayez Banihammad (from the UAE), Ahmed al Ghamdi, Hamza al Ghamdi, Mohand al Shehri Alive, Saeed al Ghamdi Alive, Ahmad al Haznawi, Ahmed al Nami Alive, Majed Moqed, and Salem al Hazmi Alive (the brother of Nawaf al Hazmi).
How can the 9/11 Commission be taken seriously when they refer to alive ‘hijackers’?
|Original hijacker list||Final named hijackers|
Waleed M. Alshehri – Alive
Wail M. Alshehri – Alive
Abdulaziz Alomari – Alive
Satam M.A. Al Suqami
|Original hijacker list (ph)
|Final named hijackers|
Salem Al Hazni
Nawar Al Hazni
|Khalid Almihdhar – Alive?
Salem Alhazmi – Alive
United Airlines Flight 175
Boeing 767-222. Fuel capacity 24,000 gallons
Scheduled flight: Boston – Los Angeles
Flight departed 07:59 a.m.
Crashed into WTC 1 08:46 a.m.
Scheduled flight: Boston – Los Angeles
Flight departed 08:14 a.m.
Crashed into WTC2 09:03 a.m.
Scheduled flight: Washington to Los Angeles
Flight departed 08:20 a.m.
Crashed into the Pentagon 09:38 a.m.
Dulles Airport is ~20 miles from the Pentagon. Why would terrorists intent on hitting the Pentagon chance a round trip of hundreds of miles?
Scheduled flight: Newark to San Francisco
Flight departed 8:42 a.m. (delayed 41 mins)
Crashed in Pennsylvania 10:06 a.m.
Flight 93 was delayed, so why didn’t the hijackers head straight for Washington to make up time?
The following video provides an explanation for why the planes took extended journeys to their targets.
|A lingering question is why the passenger loads on the four planes hijacked in U.S. skies are being described by industry officials as “very, very low.” … Through July, airlines in the United States reported flights on average were 71 percent capacity this year. [CNN 9/20/2001]|
The total passenger seating capacity of the four 9/11 airliners was 762 people. There are 229 passengers and crew members on the four death lists issued by CNN (although this figure varies). The total number of passengers on the four airliners was only 26 percent of capacity.
It just so happens that pre-9/11 insider trading leads to the CIA’s highest ranks.
The story that the hijackers used box-cutters and plastic knives in the attack on the World Trade Center is a functional fictoid. In this case, the function was diversion. This fictoid serves to divert public attentions from the responsibility, and legal liability, of the government and airlines to prevent major weapons- such as guns, bombs, chemical sprays and hunting knives from being carried aboard airplanes. If such illegal devices had been smuggled aboard the planes, the liability could amount to billions of dollars. If, on the other hand, it could be disseminated that the hijackers had only used plastic knives, such as those provided by the airlines for meals, or box cutters, which were allowed on planes, neither the airlines, the screeners at the airport, or the FAA, which regulates the safety of airports, could be held legally responsible. [Full Details]
Several major news organizations wrongly identified at least four pilots of Middle Eastern descent as likely hijackers. Two of the wrongly suspected pilots had Arabic names similar to those of two dead hijackers. A pilot living next door to one of them became a third wrong suspect. A pilot with the same last name became the fourth wrong suspect — even though he’d been dead for a year. [Wall Street Journal]
The BBC reported a transcript of a phone call made by Flight Attendant Madeline Amy Sweeney to Boston air traffic controls in which she gave the seat numbers occupied by the hijackers, and these seat numbers did not correspond with those of the men claimed by the FBI to be responsible for the hijacking:
The FBI has named five hijackers on board Flight 11, whereas Ms Sweeney spotted only four. Also, the seat numbers she gave were different from those registered in the hijackers’ names. [BBC News]
CNN reported that the men who hijacked the aircraft used phony IDs containing the names of real people living in Arab nations in the middle east.
The Saudi Airlines pilot, Saeed Al-Ghamdi, 25, and Abdulaziz Al-Omari, an engineer from Riyadh, are furious that the hijackers’ “personal details” – including name, place, date of birth and occupation – matched their own. [Telegraph]
The FBI says there is no evidence to link the above men to the 9/11 hijackings.
In September 2002, [FBI Director Robert Mueller] told CNN twice that there is “no legal proof to prove the identities of the suicidal hijackers.” [Insight]
So, one fact is apparent. If those who hijacked the 9/11 airplanes were using stolen identities, then we don’t know who they were or who they worked for. We can’t. It’s impossible.
A Saudi embassy official said it was difficult to know for certain whether the hijackers used bogus names. “You cannot throw a stone in Saudi Arabia without hitting an Al Ghamdi,” he said, referring to the alleged last name of three of the hijackers. [Chicago Tribune]
Now, people who are intending to commit suicide normally don’t worry about whether anyone knows their real name, and it is here that some other odd aspects of this case take on a new meaning.
We are told that the group that planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks were highly trained (possibly by the CIA) experts, with knowledge of how to steal identities and forge fake IDs, yet at the same time we are being told that these men were incapable of correctly filling in US visa applications.
We are also being told that they spent the night before the attack getting drunk in bars, making noise, screaming insults at the “infidels”, and doing everything they could to attract attention to themselves. They used the credit cards issued in their stolen names, allowed their driver’s licenses with the stolen names to be photocopied, and used public library computers to send emails back and forth using their stolen names signed to unencrypted messages about their plans to steal aircraft and crash them into buildings, then decorated their apartments with absurdly obvious props such as a crop dusting manual to the point where the whole affair reads like a low budget “B” detective movie from the 1930s.
In short, these men did everything they could to make sure everyone knew who they were, or more to the point, who they were pretending to be.
Because the IDs used by the hijackers were phony, we cannot know who they really were or who they really worked for. But what is apparent is that those who planned the hijackings and the 9/11 attacks went out of their way to leave plenty of clues pointing to citizens of middle eastern Arab nations.
Many of the investigators believe that some of the initial clues that were uncovered about the terrorists’ identities and preparations, such as flight manuals, were meant to be found. A former high-level intelligence official told me, “Whatever trail was left was left deliberately—for the F.B.I. to chase.” [The New Yorker]
We don’t know who planned 9/11 attacks.
But we do know who they wanted us to think they were.
We do know who they intended America to blame for the attacks.
PLEASE READ COMMENTS BELOW OUR LOGO IF YOU HAVE TIME.Thanks
The Mother of All Lies About 9/11 – Barbara Olson’s “Phone Call” From Flight 77
Tracking All Hijackers
9/11 Index of What Really Happened
wait there’s more….here are some comments the BBC received when they tried “altering” their initial reports