• A federal court ruled on Monday that North Carolina’s entire congressional map had been unconstitutionally gerrymandered to benefit the Republican Party. The court has given lawmakers two days to propose redrawn district lines, a move that will undoubtedly shape the November election. [Reuters / Jon Herskovitz]
  • This is the second time a federal court ruled that North Carolina’s partisan gerrymandering was unconstitutional. But in June, the Supreme Court declined to make a formal ruling and instead sent the case back to the federal courts because the plaintiffs needed to adjust the basis for their argument. [Politico / Josh Gerstein]
  • The three federal judges came to the same conclusion and said that the plaintiffs, a slew of voting rights advocacy groups and North Carolina residents, had viable legal standing. [NYT / Michael Wines and Richard Fausset]
  • Two of North Carolina’s top legislators have called on the Supreme Court to halt the ruling. They claim that the decision “would irreparably disrupt campaigns from both major parties.” [Charlotte Observer / Will Doran]
  • Republican legislators from North Carolina have openly admitted, however, that they’ve gerrymandered districts based on party. They don’t believe that’s illegal, though. [YouTube / Common Cause NC]
  • The partisan gerrymandering was actually a result of another court ruling from February 2016 that said legislators had racially gerrymandered congressional districts. [Splinter / Sophie Weiner]
  • It’s clear that this ruling will change the course of North Carolina’s 2018 elections. But it may not be as favorable to Democrats as some anticipate it will be. [Washington Post / Amber Phillips]
Trump tweets, South Africa withdraws
  • The African National Congress (ANC) announced on Tuesday that the South African parliament has withdrawn a land expropriation bill that would allow the government to seize land purchases in order to compensate for racial disparities in the country. [Reuters]
  • The announcement comes after President Trump falsely painted the bill as a “genocidal campaign against white farmers” in a tweet from last Wednesday. [NYT / Kimon de Greef and Palko Karasz]
  • In the wake of the announcement, the rand, South Africa‘s currency, surged in value. Nevertheless, the withdrawal is mostly “procedural” and does not signify a major change in policy. [Bloomberg / Ana Monteiro and Michael Cohen]
  • The withdrawal of the bill doesn’t mean that South Africa will end its campaign to amend racial disparities within land ownership. Instead, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa is looking into changing the country’s constitution to allow land seizures without compensation. [The Hill / Tal Axelrod]
  • Land expropriation is a step toward fixing South Africa‘s long and racist history. After 50 years of apartheid, when black people were strictly segregated and institutionally discriminated against, 90 percent of the country’s land was owned by white people. By 2017, that figure has only decreased by 18 percent. [Vox / Jennifer Williams]

download (1)

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.