Metropolitan Police were far more interested in preventing October’s Extinction Rebellion protests than in facilitating it.

Netpol

Netpol launches ‘Restricting the Rebellion’ report

Nov 21, 2019 | ProtestReports

Protester arrested during Extinction Rebellion protests in London, October 2019
PHOTO: Splento

New Netpol report says the Metropolitan Police were far more interested in preventing October’s Extinction Rebellion protests than in facilitating it.

On 20 November, Netpol launched “Restricting the Rebellion”, a report on the policing of Extinction Rebellion protests in London in October 2019, at an event at Doughty Street Chambers hosted by Green Party peer Jenny Jones.

The report found that the police systematically discriminated against disabled protesters by failing to meet their needs. It also questioned the police’s controversial use of Section 14 powers to limit the protests –ruled unlawful by the High Court on 6 November. It found the use of these powers was disproportionate and unreasonable and sought to criminalise what the police saw as an “illegal” movement, rather than judging protesters on their individual actions.

This was likely to have had a “chilling effect” on rights to freedom of expression and assembly, by making some individuals fearful of arrest simply for associating with the movement they supported.

Netpol’s report is based primarily on testimony gathered from protesters between 28 October and 3 November 2019. In total, Netpol assessed 521 reported incidents concerning potential abuses of police powers and 150 individual statements. A sample of 29 incidents illustrating the range of concerns we received is included in the report.

Media Coverage

Extinction Rebellion protest: Met accused of 521 abuses of powerThe Guardian, 20 November 2019

Extinction Rebellion protests: Police ‘discriminated against disabled campaigners’ and made ‘unnecessarily aggressive arrests’, report findsEvening Standard, 20 November 2019

An Officer Played with My Hair’ – Climate Protesters Allege Disturbing Police BehaviourVice, 21 November 2019

Six ways the police ‘abused their power’ during the Extinction Rebellion protestsDeSmog UK, 21 November 2019

Met Police discriminated against Extinction Rebellion protestors, says reportGreen World, 20 November 2019

The report found:

  • There appeared a minimal intention of balancing the right to freedom of assembly with any disruption of the community.
  • The misuse of powers intended to limit protests gave the impression to officers on the ground that all protests were banned, providing the justification for the misuse of other powers to “prevent crime”.
  • The barrage of negative commentary from the most senior levels of the Metropolitan Police is likely to have influenced the alleged misconduct that is documented in this report.
  • Too often far more than a minimum level of force was used to make arrests of protesters, despite their compliance and commitment to non-violence.
  • The number of complaints from disabled protesters and condemnation of the Metropolitan Police’s own disability advisors demands an urgent review of how the police facilitate disabled people’s right to protest and how disabled people are treated on arrest.
  • Rather than avoiding surprises, the policing operation caused confusion and alarm amongst protesters and despite XR’s commitment to regular liaison with the police, it often found itself trying to engage in dialogue that was largely one-way, with officers who were not acting in good faith.

At the press launch, Baroness Jones said:

I am shocked in particular by the absolute disregard for the welfare and rights of disabled protesters, as well as those who are elderly and less physically robust. Based on their experiences outlined in this report, I fully support the call for an urgent review of how, in future, the police facilitate disabled people’s right to protest and how disabled protesters are treated on arrest

The report highlights concerns we have raised repeatedly over the last decade about a token commitment by the police to genuinely facilitating the right to protest.

The Extinction Rebellion protests in October 2019 were undoubtedly disruptive, but they were also a non-violent attempt to encourage the public to recognise the scale of the climate emergency and force the government to act. However, the police’s zero-tolerance approach escalated into unnecessarily aggressive arrests, a disregard for protesters’ welfare and eventually to the unlawful use of police powers.

Download a copy of the full report here [PDF]

Share this:

Related

CALL-OUT: Let us know about oppressive policing during September’s Extinction Rebellion protests26/08/2020In “Protest”

Government plans major crackdown in 2021 on the right to protest26/11/2020In “Protest”

Police restrictions on protests were not just unlawful but a breach of human rights02/12/2019In “Comment”

Search

Archives

Archives  Select Month   November 2020    October 2020    September 2020    August 2020    July 2020    June 2020    May 2020    March 2020    February 2020    January 2020    December 2019    November 2019    October 2019    September 2019    August 2019    July 2019    June 2019    May 2019    March 2019    February 2019    January 2019    December 2018    November 2018    October 2018    July 2018    June 2018    May 2018    April 2018    March 2018    January 2018    November 2017    September 2017    August 2017    July 2017    June 2017    May 2017    April 2017    March 2017    February 2017    November 2016    September 2016    August 2016    July 2016    June 2016    May 2016    April 2016    March 2016    February 2016    January 2016    December 2015    November 2015    October 2015    September 2015    August 2015    July 2015    June 2015    May 2015    April 2015    March 2015    February 2015    January 2015    December 2014    November 2014    October 2014    September 2014    August 2014    July 2014    June 2014    May 2014    April 2014    March 2014    February 2014    January 2014    December 2013    November 2013    October 2013    September 2013    August 2013    July 2013    June 2013    May 2013    April 2013    March 2013    February 2013    January 2013    December 2012    November 2012    October 2012    September 2012    August 2012    July 2012    June 2012    May 2012    April 2012    March 2012    February 2012    January 2012    December 2011    November 2011    October 2011    September 2011    August 2011    July 2011    June 2011    May 2011    April 2011    March 2011    January 2011  

Netpol supports 'Together Against Prevent'

Contacts

Email info@netpol.org
Public PGP Key is: B5DF02067D4F07A9

Postal address:
CIU Offices
Durning Hall Centre
Earlham Grove
London
E7 9AB

Signup to our Newsletter

Email Address First Name Last NameSubmit

This site uses cookies More infoNo problem

:)

Published by technofiend1

Kazan- Kazan National Research Technical University Казанский национальный исследовательский технический университет имени А. Н. Туполева he graduated in Economics in 1982

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: