What might have gone wrong -“SN10 engine was low on thrust due (probably) to partial helium ingestion from fuel header tank,” the billionaire explained. “Impact of 10m/s crushed legs & part of skirt.” After that (not unlike Nasa Apollo missions) the rocket blew up on the pad

 Cosmic Perspective

MUSK’S HEISENBERG

ELON MUSK BREAKS SILENCE ON WHY LAST STARSHIP PROTOTYPE EXPLODED

byVICTOR TANGERMANN

YESTERDAY COSMIC PERSPECTIVE

HERE’S WHAT LIKELY WENT WRONG.

An Explanation

SpaceX’s SN10 Starship prototype may have landed successfully, but the subsequent explosion arguably left something to be desired.

The Elon Musk-led company is now hard at work to stop the next prototype, dubbed SN11, from blasting itself into tiny bits of steel shrapnel. That means that the big question in the space industry is whether it’ll succeed — a tension that, naturally, seems to be top-of-mind for Musk himself.

Sloshing Helium

Musk took to Twitter on Tuesday to explain what may have gone wrong during SN10’s maiden voyage last month.

“SN10 engine was low on thrust due (probably) to partial helium ingestion from fuel header tank,” the billionaire explained. “Impact of 10m/s crushed legs & part of skirt.”

The next prototype could have some sturdier legs to make sure the ground doesn’t cause any damage to the fuel tanks above. “Multiple fixes in work for SN11,” Musk promised in the tweet.

Sucking Bubbles

When asked if there were any baffles, which are devices used to restrain a liquid fluid or gas, in place to keep the rocket fuel from sloshing around, Musk made an educated guess — and elaborated on what may have caused SN10 to blow up.

“There were baffles, but one may have acted like a straw to suck bubbles in from above liquid/gas level.”

Musk spoke from experience. “Something similar happened on an early Falcon 1 flight, resulting in unexpectedly high liquid oxygen residuals at main engine cutoff,” he added.

SN11 has already been rolled onto the launch pad, where it’s awaiting its first static fire tests. SpaceX has a decent chance of both landing it — and not have another massive explosion on its hands.

If it does explode, there will be plenty of future prototypes to iron out the kinks. Keen eyed onlookers have already spotted leg skirts for a prototype called SN20.

READ MORE: Elon Musk Explains Why the Starship SN10 Prototype Exploded After Landing [Gizmodo]

More on Starship: SpaceX Just Rolled Its Next Starship Prototype Onto the Pad

As a Futurism reader, we invite you join the Singularity Global Community, our parent company’s forum to discuss futuristic science & technology with like-minded people from all over the world. It’s free to join, sign up now!

PEER REVIEWED CONTENT FROM PARTNERS WE LOVE

DIFFERENT STROKESFORMER NASA LEADER SAYS SPACEX SHOULD BUILD NASA’S MOON ROCKETMONDAYREAD MOREPOST MORTEMELON MUSK SAYS STARSHIP “LANDED IN ONE PIECE.” FACT CHECK: KINDA.MAR 4READ MOREHMMMMSPACEX’S THIRD STARSHIP PROTOTYPE LANDS, EXPLODES MINUTES LATERMAR 3READ MOREBEZOS VS MUSKDID JEFF BEZOS STEP DOWN AT AMAZON TO FOCUS ON A SPACE EMPIRE?FEB 8READ MORE

Published by technofiend1

Kazan- Kazan National Research Technical University Казанский национальный исследовательский технический университет имени А. Н. Туполева he graduated in Economics in 1982

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: